Andreas Praefcke, Public domain, via Wikimedia Commons

How has disability been treated through history? Is this a story of progress?

People in motion - Borders in motion | CE 1800 - present | Ravensburg (Germany)

This is the monument to the Grey Buses [Denkmal der Grauen Busse].

In 2006, this monument was erected at the Weißenau Psychiatric Centre in Ravensburg.

A replica of the memorial travelled from city to city. It has visited most of the main German cities since then.

What story might this monument tell?

Why do you think this to be the case?

How are these objects connected to the question?

Although the sample of objects selected belong to different periods, all of them give archaeologists and historians a better understanding of the past. They may help you to answer the question and reflect upon whether the history of disability has been a story of progress or not, and thus answer the question that is the focus of this investigation:

How has disability been treated through history? Is this a story of progress?

Observe, examine and analyse the objects identified below to help you to answer the main enquiry question.
Roman artificial leg excavated from a tomb near Capua.
zoom_in

Science Museum Group. Copy of Roman artificial leg, London, England, 1905-1915. A646752. Science Museum Group Collection Online.

Object 1

The image shows a Roman artificial leg dated from 300 BCE excavated from a tomb near Capua. The “Capua leg”, as it is known, was made of bronze and  fastened to a wooden core.

Observe the shape and materials used in making the "Capua leg":

Do you think the Capua leg worked effectively as an artificial limb?

Who might this object have been made for? Would they have been wealthy or poor?

What does this object reveal to us about life in Ancient Rome?

Show detailsadd
Human remains from the 5th-6th century CE found in Saint-Jean-des-Vignes (Saône-et-Loire, France). zoom_in

Maïté Rivollat, Dominique Castex, Laurent Hauret, Anne-marie Tillier, Ancient Down syndrome: An osteological case from Saint-Jean-des-Vignes, northeastern France, from the 5–6th century AD, International Journal of Paleopathology, Volume 7, 2014, Pages 8-14, ISSN 1879-9817.

Object 2

This skeleton was found  in a burial in Saint-Jean-des-Vignes (Saône-et-Loire, France). It dated to the 5–6th century CE.

The skeleton corresponds to a 5–7 year old child whose features were consistent with the diagnosis of Down syndrome. He was afforded a normal mode of burial among other members of the community.

What does this burial tell about disability in Ancient times?

How common was this kind of treatment?

Show detailsadd
1940 Edict. zoom_in

Marcel (Photographer) Derivative work MagentaGreen, Public Domain, via Wikimedia Commons.

Object 3

The wording of the edict shown in the image read as follows:

«Reich Leader Bouhler and Dr. Brandt are entrusted with the responsibility of extending the authority of physicians, to be designated by name, so that patients who, after a most critical diagnosis, on the basis of human judgment, are considered incurable, can be granted mercy death . -- A. Hitler».
Comment: «given to me by Bouhler on 27.8. [August] [19]40; Dr. Gürtner».

Franz Gürtner was Minister for Justice (Reichsjustizminister) from 1932 to his death in 1941. Philipp Bouhler was leader of Hitler's Chancellery (KdF).

Who were those incurably sick patients?

How did the Nazi party try to justify their barbaric treatment of those with disabilities?

Show detailsadd
Marlen D. in a pushcart, Ahlbeck 1976. zoom_in

Private property, German Democratic Republic.

Object 4

This photograph taken in 1976 shows a girl called Marlen sitting in a pushcart. From the age of 6, this pushcart was used to help Marlen get to wherever she needed to go. It was not until she was 19 years of age that she finally received her own wheelchair.

Why did Marlene not use a wheelchair until she was 19 years old? 

How do you think Marlen may have felt about having to use a pushcart to move about?

Show detailsadd

Once you have observed and analysed the selection of objects and sources, reflect, discuss and answer the compelling question. Use the objects and sources as evidence for your arguments.

Tools and guidelines for students

PDF Guide description PDF Guide 2 description

Support material for teachers

PDF Guide description
Continue to the next section arrow_downward